The differences among your Personal Vision, your Photographic Vision and your Artistic Vision.

The differences among your Personal Vision, your Photographic Vision and your Artistic Vision.

Christmas market in Jungfernstieg, Hamburg, Germany.[/caption]

Published on 2015/12/05 - Text and Pictures by Alberto Mateo, Travel Photographer for The Last Footprint.

A 'Personal Vision' is a way to see the world around us. It is not something we have been born with, but something we have to develop throughout our life. It is a different way to experience our world. A "Photographic Vision" is someting that has to do with a photographic camera; it is about knowing what can be taken as a photograph. An "Artistic Vision" is what allows me to express a feeling with a photograh, no matter if the picture resembles reality (we would call it a 'figurative picture') or not (we would call it a 'non figurative' picture, like the one you see above).

One of the best advances of internet has brought to us is the possibility to know people who share our hobbies or passions. In my case it was clear that these people would be around photography, so it was a pleasant surprise when I discovered the National Geographic had a forum about photography Called “Your Shot”, where you can upload your own pictures and comment them with other photographers. It is a great possibility this wonderful publication has given to us to share our photographic experiences with other people who share our passion for photography. I recommend you to open an account as soon as possible.
When I entered Your Shot for the first time I read the photo submission guidelines. “We allow and encourage all types of photography. We love to see new photography and watch our members experiment with creative styles and techniques. We are device agnostic, happy to see images from full-frame DSLRs, film cameras, smartphones, and others. Our biggest ask is that the photos stay true to your personal vision and to what you saw. Please avoid heavy-handed processing. We want to see the world through your eyes, not through the excessive use of editing tools. If the photograph is manipulated, please describe your process in the caption.” I was not very surprised at first when I read these lines, but when I looked on my file for pictures to upload I saw the picture that opens this post and began to hesitate if it would comply the submission guidelines. As a photographer I can state regarding the picture I have uploaded to open this post that:
  • The movement effect has ONLY been achieved with a usual DSLR camera.
  • Digital Edition Tools have only been used to color correct and adjust the contrast and brightness of areas of the original RAW file, and always trying to get my tweaked picture as near to reality as possible.
All the analogic or digital processes that I have performed to get this image have only been used to suggest or convey a sense of motion that existed in the scene I had in front of me when I pressed the shutter of my camera. Everything was moving in this crowded market in Hamburg and I wanted in my picture to express that feeling. [pullquote]Everything was moving in this crowded market in Hamburg and I wanted in my picture to express that feeling.[/pullquote] Noone can doubt that this picture is a deviation of reality. No human being, unless she has a serious neuro-optical disorder, is able to ‘see’ the world this way. Only photographic cameras are able to see the world the way has been rendered in this picture.

If I have to answer the question if this picture is something I have seen ‘with my eyes’, I have to say: “No”. If I have to answer if this picture conveys what I saw and felt, I have to answer: “Yes, even more than the static picture I would have shot setting the parameters of my camera at more common values following the rules of the ‘technically correct picture’.”

Gallen Rowell, who is known to have been very critic about digital techniques, wrote in his article ‘Reality, Visions and Photographs’: “I have grown to accept the fact that the borders between real vision and photographic vision can never precisely be defined, but that’s very different from conceding that there are no boundaries. I have given up the battle on the commercial front, where photographers have come to be considered illustrators with limited accountability for content, but I am ready to fight for my beliefs about the need for more integrity across the board in editorial photography.”

  Regarding this image I can say that my ‘photographic vision’ allowed me to take it using different parameters on my camera than the ones that would have led me to a more static and usual picture. On the other hand, my ‘personal vision’ will never allow me to see the world this way, I will never be able to state that ‘I saw this image through my eyes’. The ‘Digital Vision’ (which is cousin of the ‘Artistic vision’) is the one that allows me to express a meaning of feeling with Digital Edition Tools applied to photography and/or other process like painting. One of the best examples I have ever seen is this wonderful digital composition by Travis Smith - www.seempieces.com

Terria CD Cover by Travis Smith - www.seempieces.com. Published with kind permission.

It is clear that this picture have never existed in our world, but in the mind of an artist, but does it have less value as a photograph? I do not think so. Someone may state that it has no value as a proof of existence of its referent, as other photojournalistic works have, but it was simply conceived with other finality. Being National Geographic a source of unbiased information during more than a century I understand the zeal of her staff on protecting the integrity of the submitted photographs to the Forum, but have to say this photograph resides somewhere within the interstices of the guidelines, and those guidelines could be extended to include images that have other values different than their journalistic approach. 

Jungsferstieg, Hamburg, Germany. Source: Google Maps.


TECHNICAL DATA OF THE PUBLISHED IMAGE

APERTURE: f22

I closed my lens as much as possible to get the sensation of movement.

ISO: 100

Light intensity was low in a Christmas day in the North of Europe (we were near dusk) and wanted to have a veeeery long exposure, so set my ISO as low as possible.

MODE: S

My main need was to have movement, so went for a low shutter speed.

LENS USED: Nikon 12-24mm AF

Used at 14 mm (21mm on a 35mm size sensor)

I wanted to be show the head in relation with the movement around, so used my Nikon 12-24mm wide angle and tried to locate the camera as near as possible to my subject.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

I wanted to be show the head in relation with the movement around, so used my Nikon 12-24mm wide angle and tried to locate the camera as near as possible to my subject.


Have you liked this post? If so you can SUBSCRIBE to The Last Footprint to receive the last updates, learn photography and get travel tips. It is FREE and you can unsubscribe whenever you want.

0 comments

Write a comment

Comments are moderated